Protecting Rights in the Policy Process: Integrating Policy Analysis and Proportionality.

Citation:

Kremnitzer, Mordechai, and Raanan Sulitzean-Kenan. 2021. “Protecting Rights in the Policy Process: Integrating Policy Analysis and Proportionality.”. International Review of Public Policy 3(1): 51-71. https://journals.openedition.org/irpp/1974.

Abstract:

This paper proposes to break through the current divide between legal proportionality and policy analysis, and suggests that policy-making should and can be conducted in a way that facilitates the proportionality doctrine, while the latter is adapted to the unique goals and practices of policy analysis. Such integration of proportionality in policy analysis can streamline the consideration of fundamental rights in the policy-making process and consequently increase their protection. We further suggest that the proposed integration of proportionality in policy analysis may complement the limitations of courts in performing judicial review of policy, by offering courts procedural criteria, in addition to the often contested substantive criteria. We begin with a brief presentation of the two domains. Next, we review key differences between the practice of judges and policy-analysts, with the aim of designing the stages of policy analysis in a manner that suits its unique characteristics. Drawing on these foundations, we propose broad guidelines for a normative model of policy analysis that accommodates the requirements of proportionality. Lastly, we consider and discuss the implications of this potential development in policy analysis for the practice of judicial review of public policy.

Publisher's Version

Last updated on 05/17/2021