Citation:
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan, and Yifat Holzman-Gazit. 2016. “Form and Content: Institutional Preferences and Public Opinion in a Crisis Inquiry”. Administration & Society 48(1): 3-30. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0095399712469197.
Abstract:
Crisis inquiries are intended to serve as instruments for restoring legitimacy. This intended goal has led to particular legitimacy-enhancing institutional choices in the design of these ad hoc institutions. This research utilizes a national panel study to test the effect of institutional attributes of a crisis inquiry and the content of its report on its legitimacy, and the effects of the inquiry findings on public opinion regarding the inquired issue. Our results show that only some institutional attributes predicted the legitimacy of the inquiry findings, whereas the content of the report was strongly and consistently associated with report legitimacy.
